Beyond Quantum Computing & Quantum Computers

How quantum computers will reshape the cryptographic landscape ...

Continuing where we left off last time… https://its101010.com/2020/08/08/even-better-quantum-computers/

The Ultimate Question we want to answer today is – Can We Do Better than Quantum Computers & Quantum Computing?

or,

Whats Beyond Quantum Computing?

or,

Whats Better than Quantum Computing?

Please ignore the arguments given by the blogger in the video below. Those are outright wrong and 3000 BC Science. Just focus on the options he lists for what we could do beyond Quantum Computing. Like Quantum Gravity, Quantum Field Theory … based Computations etc.

Since the blogger has documented the options pretty well in the video above we don’t want to repeat them.

Conclusion

Everyone knows we are NOT Philosophers.

Everyone knows we are NOT Academics interested in writing papers.

Everyone knows we are NOT Journalists or Regular Bloggers interested in documenting or covering technologies and breakthroughs.

We are Automatski. The only reason we wrote this article is BECAUSE after our Quantum Computing Millennium Invention we have moved onto Building The Future of Beyond Quantum Computing.

If we say it, it is either already done or will be completed very soon.

*Peace*

Even Better Quantum Computers

Beyond Quantum Supremacy: The Hunt for Useful Quantum Computers ...

Automatski Created The Worlds First Billion Qubit & Gates Quantum Computers by 2014. We proved that The Universe is NOT Only a Simulation, but that its a O(N) Simulation. We also proved The [Extended] Church Turing Thesis. And that Quantum Computers can be simulated Classically without an Exponential Slowdown in O(N) using the Quantum Physical Algorithms of The Universe. It seems we couldn’t go any further or do any better.

But we think we could. Lets see one way we could do that.

What are Qubits?

In quantum computing, a qubit or quantum bit is the basic unit of quantum information—the quantum version of the classical binary bit physically realized with a two-state device. A qubit is a two-state quantum-mechanical system, one of the simplest quantum systems displaying the peculiarity of quantum mechanics.

The Two States can be |0> and |1>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qubit

What are Qutrits?

Qutrits are 3 State Quantum Systems.

What are Ququarts?

Ququarts are 4 State Quantum Systems.

What are Qudits?

You see where we are going with this?

A Qudit is a generic ‘N’ state Quantum Mechanical System.

https://www.cio.com/article/3099631/russian-scientists-just-found-an-easier-way-to-build-quantum-computers.html

Summary

Because of those additional potential states, it takes fewer qudits than qubits to do the same amount of work.

“A qudit with four or five levels or states is able to function as a system of two ‘ordinary’ qubits, and eight levels is enough to imitate a three-qubit system,” explained Aleksey Fedorov, a researcher at the Russian Quantum Center.

Fedorov and his colleagues demonstrated that on one qudit with five levels, created using an artificial atom, it is possible to perform full quantum computations.

Universality

We need atleast 2 Qubit Gates for Universal Quantum Computation. Which means to be able to do everything thats possible with Quantum Computers we need to implement 2 Qubit Gates which operate on 2 Qubits at the same time.

But what about Qudits?

Some people say that since a single Qudit with 4-5 levels or states is equivalent to 2 Entangled Qubits it is by itself Universal and Sufficient for Universal Quantum Computation. We beg to differ.

We think we need atleast 2 Qudit Gates which operate on atleast 2 Entangled Qudits to achieve Universal Quantum Computation. But we agree that 2 Qudit Gates and Qudits are way superior and computationally compact compared to 2 Qubit Gates and Qubits.

Can we still do any better? Yes!

What is CV – Continuous Variable Quantum Computing? With Qumodes?

Continuous-variable quantum information is the area of quantum information science that makes use of physical observables, like the strength of an electromagnetic field, whose numerical values belong to continuous intervals. One primary application is quantum computing. In a sense, continuous-variable quantum computation is “analog”, while quantum computation using qubits is “digital.”

In more technical terms, the former makes use of Hilbert spaces that are infinite-dimensional, while the Hilbert spaces for systems comprising collections of qubits are finite-dimensional. One motivation for studying continuous-variable quantum computation is to understand what resources are necessary to make quantum computers more powerful than classical ones.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous-variable_quantum_information

Xanadu has taken an interesting approach to quantum computing.

While companies like Rigetti and IBM use the qubit model , Xanadu is developing a continuous variable model.

The CV model requires less coupled systems to perform computations. Nevertheless, while the CV model has certain advantages over the qubit model, it also presents its own problems and limitations.

The first apparent difference between these two models deal with quantum bits, the information carrying units of a quantum computer. While the qubit or the generic qudit models use discrete-valued quantum systems, the CV model uses qumodes that reside in an infinite dimensional space.

Can we still do any better? Yes! Maybe!

See that in our next article … https://its101010.com/2020/08/08/beyond-quantum-computing-quantum-computers/

Conclusion

Everyone knows we are NOT Philosophers.

Everyone knows we are NOT Academics interested in writing papers.

Everyone knows we are NOT Journalists or Regular Bloggers interested in documenting or covering technologies and brekathroughs.

We are Automatski. The only reason we wrote this article is BECAUSE we are about to put ALL OF THE ABOVE in production for our customers very soon. And yes they will have Billions of Qudit and Qumodes, and Gates.

The Secret to Automatski’s Quantum Computer

The Secret to Automatski’s Quantum Computer is the O(N) implementation of the Quantum Physics (Model) of the Transmon Qubit.

Once you have the Quantum Physical Model of the Qubit successfully implemented. You have to extend the Mathematical Perspective of Quantum Gates in terms of Quantum Physics Evolution Quantum Systemc of ‘N’ Qubits where N= 100,000 .. 1000,000 etc.

Basically please stop thinking in terms of Computations and Mathematics. Think only in terms of Quantum Physics. The underlying Quantum Many Body Simulation aka The Algorithm of The Universe is plenty solvable in O(N).

Trust me, if you have a model of a spinning electron and a physical model of a Schrödinger’s evolution. Thats all you need to implement a perfect Quantum Computer.

And thats exactly what we have done in 2014.

The Father of Quantum Computing

The Father of Powered Flight is NOT the people who dreamt of flying in the sky like birds. The Father of Powered Flight is the person who did it successfully. The Father of Quantum Computing are NOT those people who dreamt up of The Awesomeness of Quantum Computing. The Father of Quantum Computing is the person who actually created the worlds most powerful quantum computers compared to all the crapware and vaporware everyone else was fantasising about and was peddling.

  • Aditya Yadav, CEO, Automatski, The Father of Quantum Computing

Status – Nuclear Fusion

France has now started building out its Fusion Reactor. Automatski hasn’t even started. But there is a difference. While idiotas continue to say that Automatski has nothing. Every physical build is preceded by years of research, design and experimentation. To validate the hypotheses and the approach. In that sense nobody has built their reactor completely, so one could say that nobody has nothing.

Now there are some essential differences between other efforts and Automatski.

France spent $23.5 billion while Automatski has a total budget of $500m.

With their costs we can never have a economically viable production solution. Ours is just the right price for global production of energy using nuclear fusion.

They are targetting ~2 trillion degrees. We are targetting at best 200-500 million degrees.

They are using deuterium-tritium fuel we are primarily using Hydrogen.

Their reactor weighs 23,000 tonnes. Ours can be miniaturised and put on merchant navy ships and space ships, and locally in every city, town on the planet (without massive grids and grid losses) in 10-20 years of further engineering basically fine tuning and testing.

They started 60 years ago since 1960, and will goto production not before 2035 AD. We started 25 years ago and will goto production in 2030 AD. 75 years versus 35 years!!!

They are Fully Funded and we are Bootstrapped. And unless we can raise the funds we will never goto production anytime.

They are in a race to be the first. We are not. There is no extraordinary benefit to being first in this space. No exclusivity. This is a space to deliver the best solution first and foremost as early as possible not necessarily first. Yet we should be 5 years before them.

What do we have which nobody else does?

“The major obstruction to fusion is the Coulomb repulsion between nuclei. Since the attractive nuclear force that can fuse nuclei together is short ranged, the repulsion of like positive charges must be overcome to get nuclei close enough to induce fusion.”

It is nearly impossible to make atoms fuse unless you can push them against each other at MeV’s of energy.

And then you have to sustain the reaction and extract more energy out of it than you put in.

Automatski has figured out a (couple of ) way(s) to reduce the Temperature and Input Energies and yet keep the Reaction Sustainable. And hugely Net Energy Generating.

Feynman’s Universal Quantum Simulators

When Feynman described a Quantum Computer for the first time he used the words “Universal Quantum Simulator” he was referring to any and all systems that would implement Quantum Physics to do quantum computations. He said a Classical implementation would incur an exponential slowdown. (Which we have disproved in 2014) and therefore he justified building a hardware Quantum Computer. Or in his words a Hardware Universal Quantum Simulator.